All Essays
About
Contact
/// CONSULTING ENGAGEMENT
Focus: Trust scaffolding, lifecycle system design, and future-state communications architecture
The Challenge: LegalZoom’s lifecycle function was operating as a cost center—high-output broadcasting with no unified system for trust, timing, or identity. In a category where customers make high-stakes legal decisions, it was more than a CX issue; it was a revenue problem. I needed to help the Lifecycle team stop the random acts of marketing.
The Diagnosis: I audited formation flows (DBA, EIN, Trademarks) and identified five structural failures where revenue was leaking:
Intent Decay: Nudges triggered hours or days late, missing the critical window of user intent.
Trust Vacuum: Competitors used early verification to build confidence; LegalZoom treated users like anonymous browsers with no "trust handshake."
Broken Continuity: "Finish setup" emails routed users to generic splash pages rather than rehydrating their specific session.
Blind Messaging: Directives to "finish" never diagnosed why the user stopped (price vs. confusion vs. speed).
Cannibalization: Without arbitration rules, multiple products competed for attention in the same inbox.
The Solution: A Revenue-First Architecture I delivered a systems roadmap that shifted lifecycle from "sending emails" to "orchestrating revenue":
T+2h Architecture: Aligned contact cadence with real-time intent windows.
Day-0 Trust: Implemented immediate identity verification and data-safety reassurance to reduce anxiety.
Session Rehydration: Built a deep-linking framework to persist user state across devices.
Micro-Diagnostics: Replaced generic nudges with diagnostic prompts to segment users by friction point (Cost vs. Confidence).